CNL-605 Personality Disorders Case Study Presentation (Obj. 7.1 and 7.2)

PowerPoint-Presentation

CNL-605 Personality Disorders Case Study Presentation (Obj. 7.1 and 7.2)

 

Assessment Description

Choose and read any one case study from Chapter 13 (Personality Disorders) in DSM-5 in Action.

Research the specific personality disorder from your chosen case study.

Create a 10-15-slide PowerPoint presentation about your selected case study.

Include the following in your presentation:

  • A brief description of the selected case study
  • Explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.
  • Information on the course of treatment for the disorder.
  • Identification of which cluster (A, B, or C) this personality disorder belongs to and an explanation of your rationale.
  • Information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.
  • A minimum of five scholarly references including your textbook and the latest version of the DSM. Be sure to only use current and scholarly references for this assignment.
  • Include detailed speaker notes that represent what you would say if giving the presentation in person.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Resources if you need assistance.

CNL-605 Personality Disorders Case Study Presentation (Obj. 7.1 and 7.2) – Rubric

Criteria Description

Brief Description of the Selected Case Study

5. Excellent

13 points

The presentation includes a comprehensive description of the selected case study.

4. Good

11.31 points

The presentation includes an advanced description of the selected case study.

3. Satisfactory

10.27 points

The presentation includes an adequate description of the selected case study.

2. Less than Satisfactory

9.62 points

The presentation includes a vague description of the selected case study.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation omits a brief description of the selected case study.

Criteria Description

Rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis According to the DSM

5. Excellent

26 points

The presentation includes a comprehensive explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.

4. Good

22.62 points

The presentation includes an advanced explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.

3. Satisfactory

20.54 points

The presentation includes an adequate explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.

2. Less than Satisfactory

19.24 points

The presentation includes a vague explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation omits an explanation and rationale for the Personality Disorder Diagnosis using the latest version of the DSM as a reference.

Criteria Description

Course of Treatment for the Disorder

5. Excellent

19.5 points

The presentation includes comprehensive information on the course of treatment for the disorder.

4. Good

16.97 points

The presentation includes advanced information on the course of treatment for the disorder.

3. Satisfactory

15.41 points

The presentation includes adequate information on the course of treatment for the disorder.

2. Less than Satisfactory

14.43 points

The presentation includes vague information on the course of treatment for the disorder.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation omits information on the course of treatment for the disorder.

Criteria Description

Cluster of the Personality Disorder (A, B, or C) and Rationale

5. Excellent

13 points

The presentation includes a comprehensive identification of which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and a comprehensive explanation of the rationale for the identification.

4. Good

11.31 points

The presentation includes an advanced identification of which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and an advanced rationale for the identification.

3. Satisfactory

10.27 points

The presentation includes an adequate identification of which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and includes and adequate rationale for the identification.

2. Less than Satisfactory

9.62 points

The presentation vaguely identifies which cluster the personality disorder belongs to and includes some type of rationale.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation does not identify which cluster the personality disorder belongs or include rationale for the identification.

Criteria Description

Prognosis and Prevalence of the Disorder

5. Excellent

19.5 points

The presentation includes comprehensive information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.

4. Good

16.97 points

The presentation includes advanced information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.

3. Satisfactory

15.41 points

The presentation includes adequate information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.

2. Less than Satisfactory

14.43 points

The presentation includes vague information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation omits information on the prognosis and prevalence of the disorder.

Criteria Description

Detailed Speaker Notes

5. Excellent

6.5 points

The presentation includes comprehensive speaker notes that give a complete picture of what would be said if the presentation were given in person.

4. Good

5.66 points

The presentation contains advanced speaker notes that indicate what might be said if giving the presentation in person.

3. Satisfactory

5.14 points

The presentation’s speaker notes are present and are generally competent.

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.81 points

The presentation contains vague speaker notes and/or inaccurate or poorly written speaker notes.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The presentation does not contain speaker notes.

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent

6.5 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good

5.66 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory

5.14 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.81 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent

6.5 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good

5.66 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory

5.14 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory

4.81 points

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.