Walden NURS 6052 E Wk 9 Evidence Based Practice Change

Zip file

Walden NURS 6052 E Wk 9 Evidence Based Practice Change

 

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change

 

The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.

In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach.

To Prepare:

  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT.
  • Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for your reflection.

The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change

Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

  • Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
  • Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
  • Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
  • Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
  • Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
  • Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
  • Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
    • A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
    • An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)

Rubric

Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following: Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.

Novice 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

Competent 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Proficient 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

New Column4 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an evidence-based practice approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered. Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation. Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change. Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer-reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.

Novice 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

Competent 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

Proficient 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

New Column4 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

Add a lessons learned section that includes: A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted. What did you learn from completing the evaluation table?

Novice 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

Competent 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

Proficient 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

New Column4 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria

Novice 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Competent 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Proficient 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

New Column4 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

Novice 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Competent 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Proficient 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

New Column4 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

Novice 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Competent 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Proficient 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

New Column4 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)